*Orders INEC To Immediately De-register 5 Parties
A major storm, accompanied by a rash of legal fireworks, could be brewing in the country’s political firmament following the judgment of the Federal High Court, today, in initiating a move to edge out some parties, and political titans, from the 2027 general elections.
Justice Peter Odo Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to immediately de-register the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Accord Party (AP) and others from participating in the elections over alleged constitutional breaches.
Justice Lifu handed down the order while delivering judgment in a suit filed by a group of former lawmakers in the country.
As it stands, the verdict has, for now, pending possible appeal, stopped former Vice President (VP) and presidential candidate of ADC, Atiku Abubakar, from running for the nation’s top seat.
Another prominent person also affected is Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke, seeking re-election on the AP ticket in the forthcoming 15 August, 2026 governorship election.
Marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, the suit was instituted by a civil society group, Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators (NFFL) against INEC.
Five political parties, ADC, AP, Action People’s Party (APP), Zenith Labour Party (ZLP), and the Action Alliance Party (AAP) were defendants in the suit.
Delivering his judgment, Justice Lifu barred INEC from further according the parties recognition, accepting nominations of candidates from the affected parties or giving effect to their activities for the purpose of participating in the 2027 general elections.
He directed the parties to stop parading themselves as registered political parties in the country.
The NFFL had dragged INEC before the court, praying for an order to compel the electoral umpire to deregister the five parties and prohibit them from participating in political activities in the country.
The group predicated its case against the existence of the parties on the alleged violations of the 1999 Constitutional provisions guiding party registration, recognition and existence.
Interestingly, Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi SAN, though a defendant in the suit, supported those who sought the parties’ deregistration.
He had engaged a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Joshua Olukayode Olatoke, who during the hearing of the suit, canvassed the prohibition of the parties out of existence.
INEC had, however, countered the suit in its defence, describing the plaintiff as a busybody who lacked locus standi to file the suit and had asked the court to dismiss it for lacking merit.
The suit was targeted against INEC, the AGF as the two defendants, but, by extension, the five political parties.
The originating summons was pursuant to Section 225 (A) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), Section 75 (4) of the Electoral Act, 2022, and applicable provisions of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019.
At the heart of the relief sought is whether INEC is constitutionally bound to de-register political parties that failed to meet the minimum electoral performance thresholds prescribed by law.
These include securing at least 25 per cent of votes cast in one state in a presidential election, winning a local government area in a governorship election, or clinching at least one seat in elections ranging from Councillorship to the National Assembly.
The plaintiff asked the court to determine whether INEC is empowered, or indeed obligated, to enforce the thresholds against the affected parties, which allegedly failed to win any ward, legislative seat, or elective office in previous elections.
Other issues they prayed for determination included whether the affected parties are still eligible to be recognised as legally registered political parties, and whether INEC can lawfully acknowledge or give effect to their political activities, such as congresses, primaries, campaigns, and participation in the 2027 general elections, without strict compliance with Section 225 (A) of the Constitution.
Among the reliefs sought were declaratory orders affirming that INEC is duty-bound to enforce constitutional benchmarks as a precondition for party registration and participation in elections, as well as orders compelling the electoral body to de-register the affected parties.
The plaintiff also prayed for a mandatory and perpetual order of injunctions restraining INEC from recognising, accepting, or giving effect to any political activities or correspondence from the parties unless and until they fully comply with constitutional and statutory requirements.
In an affidavit in support of an originating summons deposed to by Igbokwe Raphael Nnanna, Chairman, NFFL Board of Trustees and its National Coordinator, the group had accused INEC of neglecting its constitutional duty by continuing to recognise political parties that have failed to meet the minimum performance thresholds prescribed by the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
According to the affidavit, the affected parties have, since their registration, failed to win a single elective seat at any level of government, including presidential, governorship, National Assembly, state assembly, Chairmanship or Council elections.
The plaintiff had further claimed that the parties did not secure the constitutionally required 25 per cent of votes in at least one state in presidential elections, nor any representation across the country’s 8,809 wards, 774 Local Government Areas, 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory.
Nnanna had averred that despite these “total electoral failures,” INEC continued to accord the parties full recognition –an action the group described as unconstitutional and contrary to the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s Regulations and Guidelines for Political Parties, 2022.
The plaintiff had warned that unless restrained by the court, INEC may unlawfully permit the affected parties to participate in the 2027 general elections, thereby “clogging the ballot papers, overstretching administrative resources and misleading voters.”
The former lawmakers had argued that the continued existence of non-performing parties undermines political sanity, electoral integrity and genuine competition, while also resulting in wastage of public funds.
Describing the action as a public interest suit, the NFFL had urged the court to compel INEC to enforce constitutional compliance by de-registering political parties that have failed to meet the stipulated thresholds, in order to deepen democracy and uphold the rule of law ahead of future elections.
A SAN, Yakubu Abdullahi Ruba, backed by Barrister Gbenga Makanjuola, argued for the former lawmakers during proceedings, asking that the five political parties be proscribed out of existence.
However, Musibau Adetunmibi, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria SAN and Shuaib Eneojo Aruwa SAN had argued for the AP and ADC respectively in urging the court to dismiss the suit of the plaintiff for being frivolous, baseless and unwarranted.
