Court Orders Buhari’s Former Humanitarian Minister To Account For ₦729bn Meant For Poor Nigerians

By Hadiza Suleman

A former Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Disasters Management and Social Development, Sadia Umar-Farouk, has been ordered to account for the payments of ₦729bn to 24.3 million poor Nigerians for six months.

A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos ordered Umar-Farouk to provide the list and details of the beneficiaries who received the payments, the number of states covered and the payments per state.

The judgment was delivered in June by Hon Justice Deinde Isaac Dipeolu following a Freedom of Information suit numbered FHC/L/CS/853/2021, brought by the Socio-Economic Rights And Accountability Project (SERAP). SERAP said it obtained the certified true copy of the judgment last Friday.

Justice Dipeolu had held that, “The former minister is compelled by the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act to give information to any person including SERAP.

“I therefore grant an order of mandamus directing and compelling the minister to provide the spending details of N729 billion to 24.3 million poor Nigerians in 2021.”

Justice Dipeolu ordered the minister to “provide SERAP with details of how the beneficiaries have been selected and the mechanisms for the payments to the beneficiaries.”

READ ALSO  Groundbreaking Exploration of the Birthplace of Writing: A Review of Al-Bishak’s Black Papyrus

Justice Dipeolu also ordered the minister to “explain the rationale for paying N5,000 to 24.3 million poor Nigerians, which translates to five percent of Nigeria’s budget of N13.6 trillion for 2021.”

Justice Dipeolu said, “The minister did not give any reason for the refusal to disclose the details sought by SERAP. SERAP has reeled out the relevant sections of the Freedom of Information Act 2011 that the minister contravened and has, in line with sections 20 and 25(1) of the Act, prayed this Court for an order of mandamus to direct and compel the minister to provide the information sought.”

Justice Dipeolu dismissed the objections raised by the minister’s counsel and upheld SERAP’s arguments. Consequently, the court entered judgment in favour of SERAP against the minister.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts